Tuesday, November 30, 2004

TestDriven.NET 1.0 is released on www.testdriven.net (MbUnit ships with TD.NET). Check out the brand new web site!   

You are a TD.NET user ? Use the link builder and add a cool image like this one on your blog or web site...TestDriven.NET

posted on Tuesday, November 30, 2004 8:49:00 AM UTC  #    Comments [14]
Tracked by:
"Play Poker Online for Free on multiple tables" (Play Poker Online for Free on m... [Trackback]
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:56 PM UTC
When did you start at Microsoft? Congrats! :-D
David Stone
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:56 PM UTC
My <a title="TestDriven.NET" href="http://www.testdriven.net" target="_blank">TestDriven.NET</a> AddIn refuses to show up in VS.Net 2002 after upgrading to version 1.015
<br>:-(
Trilok
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:56 PM UTC
I think you mean 1.0.915. We are investigating.
Jonathan de Halleux
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:56 PM UTC
Jonathan,
<br>
<br>I've been a long time lurker on your blog... I am using <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a> since it has been usable (codeproject anyone ?)
<br>Keep up the good work...
<br>
<br>
Tom Janssens
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:57 PM UTC
Congratulations.
Mike Gale
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:57 PM UTC
Andrew Stopford's Weblog
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:57 PM UTC
This is really, really great -- and I'm loving it right now.
<br>
<br>But I have some concerns; I remember that I used to prefer to use <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a> all by itself. Then I got a 'version expired' popup, and had to upgrade -- with the knowledge that <a title="TestDriven.NET" href="http://www.testdriven.net" target="_blank">TestDriven.NET</a> is going to be coming out with a professional version, and since I'd prefer to have *just* <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a>, not the whole TD.NET component -- is there any way for me to use <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a> separately any more?
<br>
<br>I ask because I like <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a>, greatly prefer it to unadorned NUnit -- but if there's the SLIGHTEST chance that in two years myself or some maintenance coder will be kicked in the balls by the entrepreneurial aspirations of these great Mutant Design guys, I'd like to know about it.
<br>
<br>I absolutely love <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a>, but if I can't have the security of being able to use it as a standalone program, or know that I will be able to count on the same unit tests running a year or two after I last looked at it, it's enough to make me consider limiting myself purely to NUnit. :(
mr_luc
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:57 PM UTC
Hi,
<br>
<br>I found a slight issue (using .NET <a title="Reflector" href="http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/" target="_blank">Reflector</a>) with the GetFileName method of the ReportBase class.
<br>
<br>I tried to report this issue with the Contact button, however, it kept erroring out. I was not sure how else to report issues, so apologies in advance for doing it this way.
<br>
<br>The {0} and {1} are not working properly. Both are being set to results.Date.ToLongTimeString(). Clearly, you mean for {0} to be results.Date.ToLongDateString().
<br>
Matt Berther
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:57 PM UTC
mr_luc,
<br>
<br>I hope to put these fears to rest by having removed the timouts *completely*. These were as much as anyting to give the new installer a good workout. People don't uninstall and install for fun (I certainly don't!). I knew this had to be forced a bit. It is now at V1.0 - so no regrets. ;)
<br>
<br>While I reserve the option to one day bring out a Pro version, there are no immediate plans (dispite what you might think ;) to do so. If I ever do, it will be as well as (rather than instead of) the free one. You can think of the functionality there is now as the base-line that will always be free. Of cause people like the ever industrious Peli will be able to extend it. I've made sure the stuff he needs is all in the registry.
<br>
<br>I don't know if that alleviates your concerns at all (or just makes you even more suspicious. ;) Would knowing that Mutant Design is a one man company make any difference? It is *my* reputation at stake if I tried to pull a fast one. It wouldn't look good!
<br>
<br>Jamie &quot;Mutant Design&quot; Cansdale
Jamie Cansdale
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:58 PM UTC
Hi Matt, thanks for the feedback. I'll update the source.
<br>
<br>ps: If it is not too much of a hassle, please report this using <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a>.tigris.org issue tracking.
Jonathan de Halleux
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:58 PM UTC
The VS.Net 2002 problem was a faux pass. Sorry about that.
<br>
<br>Anyway, is there an easy way to know whether a new version of <a title="TestDriven.NET" href="http://www.testdriven.net" target="_blank">TestDriven.NET</a> contains a newer version of <a title="MbUnit, Generating Unit Testing and Model Based Testing Framework for .NET Framework" href="http://mbunit.tigris.org" target="_blank">MbUnit</a>?
Trilok
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:58 PM UTC
Good question. Unless there is an interface change, I don't change the version number... I'll put up a page on the wiki with some details about the changes.
Jonathan de Halleux
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:58 PM UTC
Seriously, when I said &quot;these great Mutant Design guys&quot;, I meant it. :) You are doing amazing work! I didn't want to make it sound as though I *expected* you to kick anyone in the balls, or as though that was your business model -- lure us in with framework that wrap some of our favorite tools, and then whammo, the boot to the boys.
<br>
<br>However, I also realize that even a guy's best friends, even good-intentioned people and the kindliest of neighbors, may at some point end up with their foot in your groin. :D The road to hell is paved with good intentions, and so forth.
<br>
<br>Capital, capital. Do carry on.
mr_luc
Monday, June 06, 2005 4:52:58 PM UTC
The word &quot;Guru&quot; is a Sanskrit word meaning teacher, honoured person, religious person or saint. Sikhism though has a very specific definition of the word Guru. It means the descent of divine guidance to mankind provided through ten Enlightened Masters. This honour of being called a Sikh Guru applies only to the ten Gurus who founded the religion starting with Guru Nanak in 1469 and ending with Guru Gobind Singh in 1708; thereafter it refers to the Sikh Holy Scriptures the Guru Granth Sahib. The divine spirit was passed from one Guru to the next as &quot;The light of a lamp which lights another does not abate. Similarly a spiritual leader and his disciple become equal, Nanak says the truth.&quot;
sikhlink
Comments are closed.