Monday, June 07, 2004

With the growing need for a decent .NET wrapper of LAPACK and since there exists no free wrapper around it (commercial version here), I have decided to take a try at this adventure (working with managed C++ is always an adventure). To help me in the task, Lapack++ a C++ wrapper around LAPACK: simple and very well done, should speed up things... (to be continued)

posted on Monday, June 07, 2004 12:42:00 PM UTC  #    Comments [7]
Tracked by:
"dutchman rv" (online) [Trackback]
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:21 PM UTC
No response?!
<br>At least I am glad to see the birth of this new project.
AI2004
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:22 PM UTC
The project is going... at slow pace. I have wrapped TNT and JAMA in a managed C++ wrapper but now the big job link all that with LAPACK.
<br>
<br>I must say I'm disapointed with TNT who does not provide any example of using it with LAPACK? Maybe I chose the wrong library ?
Jonathan de Halleux
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:22 PM UTC
Yes, it is hard to choose the C++ library.
<br>Last semester, I examined Meschach, Cooperware Matrix, Blitz, and some other libraries; but finally choose Mapack <a target="_new" href="http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/">http://www.aisto.com/roeder/dotnet/</a>
<br>to finish my homework. ^_V!
AI2004
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:23 PM UTC
I'm sure you don't do any &quot;serious&quot; computation because Mapack is seriously limited (it was a project that Lutz did when he was back in college I think).
<br>
<br>It is managed code, it does not support sparse matrice, ... :)
Jonathan de Halleux
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:23 PM UTC
Right, but the teacher did not care about it. It is just a homework, not even project.
<br>Actually, I plan to build a remoting service that contains some math toolboxs. However, it is easy to say than do it.
AI2004
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:24 PM UTC
How about NewMat11 (which dont support complex variable).
noah538
Monday, June 06, 2005 5:59:24 PM UTC
See dnAnalytics.
Jonathan de Halleux
Comments are closed.